Students
Run a history paper or a college essay before you hand it in. Keep your drafts, since they are your best backup.
Clear communication plays a vital role in building strong and effective teams. By fostering open dialogue, organizations can greatly improve collaboration. On my team, the best fix was a ten-minute call every Tuesday at nine. Regular updates help people know what everyone else is working on.
0 USD
One run per day on the detector, humanizer, paraphraser and summarizer, with up to 250 words in a detector check. Grammar checks and both counters have no daily cap.
Sign up6.99 USD / month
Billed yearly. 50,000 AI detector words, 10,000 humanizer words and 10,000 paraphraser words a month.
Choose Basic9.99 USD / month
Billed yearly. 150,000 detector words a month, with 25,000 for the humanizer and 25,000 for the paraphraser.
Choose Plus12.99 USD / month
Billed yearly. 300,000 detector words a month, with 50,000 for the humanizer and 50,000 for the paraphraser, plus the API, custom style and downloadable detector reports.
Choose ProA longer text in a language we have tested, with sentences that point the same way. The headline says it straight, for example "Reads as human-written".
Some sentences are less clear-cut. The headline softens to "Likely" and the sentence marks show you which lines pull the figure up or down.
The text is short, our two models disagree, or the sentences split both ways. You get the reason in one line, so a single figure never has to carry the decision.
The AI detector gives its clearest reading on a full passage, like an essay section or a blog draft.
Paste a few paragraphs or upload a Word file or PDF. The language is read from the text, and you can change it under Language.
Press Check for AI. One plain sentence at the top says what the reading means.
Open Most AI-like sentences to jump to the strongest signals, then read each one in context.
An AI detector estimates how much a passage reads like a language model's writing. Textlume scores each sentence in the context of the whole text, against human and AI writing in the same language and of a similar length.
It doesn't prove who wrote anything. It doesn't search for sources, and it can't name the model behind a text. Some human writing will read as AI, and some AI writing will slip through. That is why every result carries a range and a rating instead of a yes or no.
Textlume runs your text through our own detection model on our own GPU servers, and a second, independent model reads it too. When the two land far apart, the range widens and the rating drops.
Thirteen languages are calibrated, each on its own. Within a language, texts under 100 words, texts of 100 to 249 words and longer texts each get their own curve, because length changes how much the model can see.
A 2023 Stanford study found that popular detectors flagged essays by non-native English writers far more often than essays by native speakers. Textlume tests on learner writing and publishes the result. Where a language and length band still flags human writing too often, the rating stays Low and the card says the limit is ours.
As we move forward, it is essential to ensure alignment across all key stakeholders. This approach will strengthen collaboration and drive meaningful results for the entire team. Quick heads-up: the Denver client pushed Thursday's call to after lunch. Clear priorities usually make the week go smoother. If someone can grab the slides from the shared drive, I owe you a coffee.
The headline, such as Reads as AI-written or Likely human-written, is scaled to how sure the reading is. Below it sit the figure, its range and the rating. The figure describes the whole passage. It isn't the share of AI sentences.
The range shows how far the reading could move. Short text or two models that disagree will widen it, and a wide range means a Low rating.
Each sentence is marked AI, human or unclear, and a deeper shade is a stronger reading. You only see Mixed when marks fall on both sides. When the two models disagree sharply, no sentence gets a side at all.
A single accuracy number hides the two errors that matter: AI writing missed and human writing flagged by mistake. Our accuracy page shows both for each language, with sample sizes, from a test on texts the detector never saw in training or tuning.
In that test of October 12, 2026, the detector flagged 0 of 150 native English human texts and 3 of 600 English texts by non-native writers. It is weaker at catching machine text in some languages than others, French most of all, and the accuracy page shows that too. Our rule for a language: no more than 1 human text in 20, and no more than 1 non-native writer in 20, may land on the AI-written side of the line.
Run a history paper or a college essay before you hand it in. Keep your drafts, since they are your best backup.
Use a reading to start a conversation. Ask how the student built the argument and what changed between drafts. A student who wrote the paper can usually walk you through it.
Check a freelancer's blog draft before it goes live, alongside your fact checks. If a section reads as AI, ask the writer about it before you edit.
An AI text detector reads how the writing is built. Our plagiarism checker will look for the same wording on pages across the open web once it opens for checks.
| AI detector | Plagiarism checker | |
|---|---|---|
| What it compares | Your writing against patterns in human and AI text | Your wording against text published online |
| What a flag means | The passage reads like AI to our models | Some wording matches a source |
| What it can't show | Who wrote it, which model, or whether it was copied | Whether the matching wording came from AI |
| What to do next | Weigh the reading against your drafts | Open the source and check quotes and citations |
Flags on human writing happen, and one reading is never the whole story. Answer a flag with evidence.
See which sentences carry AI marks. Polished, formulaic lines can draw marks even when you wrote every word.
If you checked one paragraph, run the whole section. More text narrows the range.
Collect your outline and the document's version history. A timeline of edits shows how the piece grew.
Explain how you wrote it and share the range and rating, so the uncertainty is out in the open.
When you're signed out, your text is read for the check and nothing is saved.
When you're signed in, your checks stay in your history for up to one year. Delete entries whenever you like or turn history off.
Then run the draft through the Textlume grammar checker for spelling and punctuation. It's free.
Paid plans check several texts in one go: up to 10 on Basic, 20 on Plus and 50 on Pro. Export the results as a CSV file.
On Pro, a check becomes a printable report that you can save as a PDF. It stays only in your browser, for 24 hours.
Pro includes the API, so you can send texts for checking from your own scripts and apps.
Yes. Textlume gives you one free check a day without an account, each up to 250 words. A free check gets the full reading: the range, the confidence rating and a mark on each sentence. The pricing page shows what paid plans add, such as more words and batch checks.
As a signal, yes. As proof, no. Every detector misses some AI text and flags some human text. In our October 2026 test, Textlume caught 68 of 75 English machine texts and flagged none of 150 native English human texts. None in 150 is not a promise of never: for a sample that size, the honest ceiling on false flags is about 2.5 percent. That is why each reading comes with a range and a confidence rating. The accuracy page has the counts for every language, weak spots included.
Yes. Textlume reads the text the same way whichever assistant produced it, so it works as a ChatGPT detector and for the others too. It looks at the writing, not where it came from, so it won't tell you which assistant wrote a passage.
Yes, as one input to a conversation and never as the final word. Textlume shows which sentences read as AI and how confident the reading is. Put that next to the student's drafts and version history, and be extra careful with a Low rating or with a writer still learning English.
Textlume is calibrated for 13 languages: English, Spanish, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Polish, Russian, Turkish, Arabic, Hindi and Indonesian. It reads the language from your text, and you can set it yourself. A text in any other language gets no calibrated figure. The accuracy page has the results for each language.
At least 50 words, and more is better. Anything shorter is turned away. From 50 to 99 words, Textlume gives a reading but holds the rating at Low and tells you why. A full essay section or a complete email gives a clearer picture.
Not if you're signed out. The text is read for the check and nothing is kept. Signed in, each check stays in your history for up to one year, and you can delete entries or turn history off. Checks sent through the API aren't kept either.
Plain, polished, predictable prose can look like model output, and detectors have a known habit of flagging non-native English writers, which Textlume measures and publishes. Editing tools matter too. A grammar checker that fixes spelling and commas leaves your sentences as you built them, while a tool that rewrites whole sentences hands the wording to a model, and that wording is what a detector reads. If a flag seems wrong, check a longer sample and keep your drafts ready.
It marks each sentence as AI, human or unclear, but it can't prove who wrote any one of them. Textlume says Mixed only when marks land on both sides. The overall figure reads the whole text and is not a count of AI sentences.
Sometimes. Reworded AI writing can still read as AI, but we publish no separate figure for humanized text, so don't read a human result on a reworked draft as a clean bill. For English text, Textlume also adds a note when its second model sees signs of AI editing or a humanizer.
No. Textlume reads whether a text looks machine-written, not which model wrote it. Our test set covers 9 current chat models, plus continuations and paraphrases. One known weak spot: a text where a model carries on from a human-written opening is caught far less often.